Most teams test the same control five times for five frameworks. Amzaa holds one common control framework, and a single control maps to the matching clauses across PCI DSS, HIPAA, HITRUST, ISO 27001, SOC 2, RBI, SEBI, IRDAI, GDPR and DPDP. Test it once, and every framework it touches updates at the same moment.
"Enforce multi-factor authentication" is a single control. PCI DSS asks for it. ISO 27001 asks for it. HITRUST, SOC 2, RBI, all ask for it. Testing it five times, once per framework, is duplicated work that drifts out of sync.
Amzaa maps that one control to every clause it satisfies. Test it once, attach the evidence once, and every framework it belongs to reflects it, instantly and identically.
Collect once, comply many. The evidence does not care which auditor is looking at it.
Card data security for anyone who touches payments.
Health information protection and certification.
The information-security management baseline.
Trust-services criteria for service providers.
Indian banking and capital-markets requirements.
Insurance regulation and governance.
Data-protection duties in the EU and India.
Cybersecurity frameworks and control benchmarks.
The control framework is data, not code, so a new standard is a mapping you add, not a release we ship. Your own internal framework maps the same way.
Because every control maps to the frameworks it satisfies, your standing on each framework is computed, not compiled once a quarter by a consultant. Test a control, and your PCI score, your ISO score, your SOC 2 readiness all move at once.
The score is derived from the framework itself: coverage, test results, evidence freshness, exceptions. It is auto-rated, computed by a deterministic engine rather than entered by anyone, and you can see exactly which controls moved the number. Its reach depends on how much of a framework has been mapped to your controls, which is honest work in progress rather than a switch we have already flipped.
A rating you cannot trace to a control is an opinion. This one you can walk to its source.
A framework control is a statement of intent. What your organisation runs is a set of instances: one for the group, or one per entity, or one per platform, each covering named systems at a stated cadence. Getting from the first to the second is where governance programmes lose years.
You never hand-map it here. You answer how you operate, one question per control domain, and the engine derives the instances, their coverage and the reason each one exists. How control mapping works →
A small cohort across banking, fintech, insurance, healthcare, technology, private equity and the public sector. Early access, real influence, pricing that holds.
We are pre-launch and we will not dress it up. There are no logos on this page because there are none to show. Come and try to break the chain.