IndustryOne engine, your frameworks

Procurement-ready by construction.
Section 508 is forced on, not bolted on.

Selling to government means accessibility and control requirements that stop most vendors at the gate. Amzaa locks Section 508 and WCAG on for tenants that require them, seals every action into a verifiable trail, and governs AI on a stoppable, auditable rail.

Government & federal

The requirements that stop other vendors are already met.

Government procurement has hard gates: accessibility conformance, auditable records, demonstrable control over automation. Most vendors discover these late and retrofit them badly.

Amzaa builds them in. For a federal tenant, Section 508 and WCAG 2.2 AA are locked on from the backend and cannot be switched off from inside the tenant. Every action is sealed into a trail an agency can verify itself.

And when the question turns to AI, the answer is the same one a bank's regulator gets: it is governed, it is auditable, and it can be switched off.

Frameworks you carry
Section 508forced on for federal
WCAG 2.2 AAevery tenant, enforced
Sealed trailverifiable by the agency
AI railgoverned, killable
NIST CSFsecurity framework
Accessibility retrofitted at procurement
is a deal you already lost.
What you are actually carrying

The obligations do not arrive one at a time, and they overlap more than anyone admits.

That overlap is the opportunity. Most of these ask for the same underlying control in different words, which is why testing a control once and letting every framework that references it update at the same time is worth more than any single feature.

Accessibility, non-negotiable
Section 508 and WCAG, which procurement will verify rather than take on trust, and which stop a purchase dead when the answer is no.
Security authorisation
The control catalogue and authorisation process your agency works to, where the evidence package is the deliverable.
Records and transparency
Retention schedules and disclosure obligations that assume the record still exists and still shows who changed it.
Procurement itself
A process that asks for proof up front, and where a promise to remediate later is not an accepted answer.

We hold a regulation library decomposed to the clause, taken verbatim from official sources. On a call we will tell you plainly which of the above are already in it and which are not yet, rather than implying we have everything. How the library works →

What you run on the engine

The same platform, configured for what a government or federal organisation actually does.

See the whole platform →
Cost, and time to live

Two things we would rather you heard from us than found out later.

On cost: Accessibility remediation and authorisation evidence are usually funded as separate programmes, on top of the platform itself. Those are the lines this collapses, and it collapses them because of how the platform is built rather than through a discount.

On time: configuration is genuinely fast and we will demonstrate it rather than assert it. An implementation is not. What takes time in a rollout is almost never the software. It is agreeing your control framework and getting sign-off from people who have other jobs. No platform compresses that.

Where the money goes What going live looks like
How the saving happens
One enginenot one product per noun
One graphno reconciliation between tools
One testmany frameworks satisfied
One trailevidence is a by-product
Configurationa change is not a statement of work
Design partner programme

Bring us the question your regulator is going to ask.

A small cohort across banking, fintech, insurance, healthcare, technology, private equity and the public sector. Early access, real influence, pricing that holds.

We are pre-launch and we will not dress it up. There are no logos on this page because there are none to show. Come and try to break the chain.