Draft model-risk frameworks are turning AI governance from a policy question into a demonstration. Can it be switched off? Is there residue? Does compliance still run without it? Amzaa answers all three on a screen, with evidence an examiner can check themselves.
One action stops every agent, and fails closed if it cannot confirm. Show the board the count of AI actions before and after. The answer is a number, not a memo.
The deterministic floor runs with no model at all. When the board says no to AI, your coverage checks, lineage and staleness detection keep going.
A sealed, hash-chained trail whose root you hold outside our database. They do not have to trust your log. They verify it.
The parts a regulator cares about most, the checks, the evidence, the audit trail, are deterministic and repeatable. The AI sits on a governed rail on top, proposing and never writing, always stoppable. You get the help without surrendering the certainty.
And the kill-switch cluster in our patent portfolio was filed before the current draft frameworks existed.
A small cohort of regulated banks, NBFCs and the firms that own them. Early access, real influence, pricing that holds.
We are pre-launch and we will not dress it up. There are no logos on this page because there are none to show. Come and try to break the chain.