Draft model-risk frameworks are turning AI governance from a policy question into a demonstration. Can it be switched off? Is there residue? Does compliance still run without it? Amzaa answers all three on a screen, with evidence an examiner can check themselves.
One action stops every agent, and fails closed if it cannot confirm. Show the board the count of AI actions before and after. The answer is a number, not a memo.
The deterministic floor runs with no model at all. When the board says no to AI, your coverage checks, lineage and staleness detection keep going.
A sealed, hash-chained trail they can verify themselves rather than take on trust. Handing you the signed root to hold externally is designed and scheduled, not yet shipped.
The parts a regulator cares about most, the checks, the evidence, the audit trail, are deterministic and repeatable. The AI sits on a governed rail on top, proposing and never writing, always stoppable. You get the help without surrendering the certainty.
And the kill-switch cluster was covered by provisional patent applications filed before the current draft frameworks existed.
That overlap is the opportunity. Most of these ask for the same underlying control in different words, which is why testing a control once and letting every framework that references it update at the same time is worth more than any single feature.
We hold a regulation library decomposed to the clause, taken verbatim from official sources. On a call we will tell you plainly which of the above are already in it and which are not yet, rather than implying we have everything. How the library works →
One control mapped to every standard that asks for it.
Every subsidiary's obligations, rolled up without double counting.
Vendor tiering and assessment on the same graph as your controls.
Filing deadlines fetched from the regulator's own page.
On cost: A bank usually runs a GRC platform, a separate vendor-risk tool, an audit tool and now something for AI governance, each with its own implementation. Those are the lines this collapses, and it collapses them because of how the platform is built rather than through a discount.
On time: configuration is genuinely fast and we will demonstrate it rather than assert it. An implementation is not. What takes time in a rollout is almost never the software. It is agreeing your control framework and getting sign-off from people who have other jobs. No platform compresses that.
A small cohort of regulated banks, NBFCs and the firms that own them. Early access, real influence, pricing that holds.
We are pre-launch and we will not dress it up. There are no logos on this page because there are none to show. Come and try to break the chain.