CISOs & security leaders

You will be asked to stop it,
and then to prove you did.
Be ready for both.

When something goes wrong with AI, the questions come fast: can you stop it, did you stop all of it, and can you show what it did. Amzaa gives you the control and the evidence in one place, so the answer is a demonstration rather than a scramble.

One switch, everything

Not a per-system hunt. One action revokes every agent's ability to act, and fails closed if it cannot confirm the stop.

A floor that never sleeps

Deterministic checks run underneath, on a schedule, with no model. Killing the AI does not blind your controls.

A trail that survives scrutiny

Sealed and hash-chained, so your auditor verifies it rather than believes it. External custody of the root is designed and scheduled.

What earns your trust, not just your budget

We will tell you what is not built yet.

Tenant isolation is enforced in the backend, not left to the interface. Data is encrypted, and we do not train on yours. And where something is still in progress, we say so, on this site, rather than let you find out later.

A security leader has been burned by vendors who oversold. We would rather lose a claim than lose your trust.

Isolationenforced in the backend
Encryptionat rest and in transit
Your datanot used to train models
Honestywhat is not built, said plainly
The control and the proof
belong in the same place.
What you are actually carrying

The obligations do not arrive one at a time, and they overlap more than anyone admits.

That overlap is the opportunity. Most of these ask for the same underlying control in different words, which is why testing a control once and letting every framework that references it update at the same time is worth more than any single feature.

Your control framework
Whichever catalogue you have standardised on, and the mapping work that keeps it aligned to everything else.
Disclosure obligations
Incident and materiality reporting on clocks measured in days, which assumes you can already see what is affected.
Operational resilience
Third-party concentration, continuity and testing obligations that arrive from regulators rather than from your own risk register.
Everyone else's assessment of you
Customer security reviews, insurer questionnaires and audit requests, all asking for evidence you already have somewhere.

We hold a regulation library decomposed to the clause, taken verbatim from official sources. On a call we will tell you plainly which of the above are already in it and which are not yet, rather than implying we have everything. How the library works →

What you run on the engine

The same platform, configured for what a security organisation actually does.

See the whole platform →
Cost, and time to live

Two things we would rather you heard from us than found out later.

On cost: Security teams end up owning a GRC tool, a vendor-risk tool and a spreadsheet, and paying for the integration between them in headcount. Those are the lines this collapses, and it collapses them because of how the platform is built rather than through a discount.

On time: configuration is genuinely fast and we will demonstrate it rather than assert it. An implementation is not. What takes time in a rollout is almost never the software. It is agreeing your control framework and getting sign-off from people who have other jobs. No platform compresses that.

Where the money goes What going live looks like
How the saving happens
One enginenot one product per noun
One graphno reconciliation between tools
One testmany frameworks satisfied
One trailevidence is a by-product
Configurationa change is not a statement of work
Design partner programme

Bring us the question your regulator is going to ask.

A small cohort of regulated banks, NBFCs and the firms that own them. Early access, real influence, pricing that holds.

We are pre-launch and we will not dress it up. There are no logos on this page because there are none to show. Come and try to break the chain.