IndustryOne engine, your frameworks

Protected data,
with a trail that proves it stayed protected.

Healthcare and pharma hold the most sensitive data there is, under HIPAA, HITRUST and data-protection law. Amzaa maps those controls once, seals every access and change into a verifiable trail, and governs any AI touching that data on a stoppable rail.

Healthcare & pharma

The most sensitive data deserves the most provable governance.

Health data is a liability the moment it is mishandled. HIPAA and HITRUST define the controls; Amzaa maps them once, and seals every access into a trail that shows exactly who touched what, when, and why, verifiable by an auditor without trusting you.

Any AI in the workflow, triage, coding, drafting, runs on the governed rail: it proposes, a human approves, the engine writes, and one switch stops it all.

When the record itself proves it was not tampered with, an investigation is a verification, not an argument.

Frameworks you carry
HIPAAprotected health information
HITRUSTcertification framework
DPDP · GDPRpatient data rights
ISO 27001security baseline
AI railgoverned, killable
An access log you could have edited
proves nothing about the access.
What you are actually carrying

The obligations do not arrive one at a time, and they overlap more than anyone admits.

That overlap is the opportunity. Most of these ask for the same underlying control in different words, which is why testing a control once and letting every framework that references it update at the same time is worth more than any single feature.

Protected health data
HIPAA-style obligations, and the assurance frameworks your partners will assess you against before they share anything.
Regulated systems and records
Electronic records and signature rules, and the validated-system expectations that make every change an evidence event.
Quality and manufacturing
Good-practice regimes where the audit trail is not a nice-to-have but the thing being inspected.
Privacy across jurisdictions
Patient and subject data under more than one privacy law at once, usually with different retention answers.

We hold a regulation library decomposed to the clause, taken verbatim from official sources. On a call we will tell you plainly which of the above are already in it and which are not yet, rather than implying we have everything. How the library works →

What you run on the engine

The same platform, configured for what a healthcare or pharma organisation actually does.

See the whole platform →
Cost, and time to live

Two things we would rather you heard from us than found out later.

On cost: Validation and evidence collection are usually people-time rather than licence cost, and that is the line that actually hurts. Those are the lines this collapses, and it collapses them because of how the platform is built rather than through a discount.

On time: configuration is genuinely fast and we will demonstrate it rather than assert it. An implementation is not. What takes time in a rollout is almost never the software. It is agreeing your control framework and getting sign-off from people who have other jobs. No platform compresses that.

Where the money goes What going live looks like
How the saving happens
One enginenot one product per noun
One graphno reconciliation between tools
One testmany frameworks satisfied
One trailevidence is a by-product
Configurationa change is not a statement of work
Design partner programme

Bring us the question your regulator is going to ask.

A small cohort across banking, fintech, insurance, healthcare, technology, private equity and the public sector. Early access, real influence, pricing that holds.

We are pre-launch and we will not dress it up. There are no logos on this page because there are none to show. Come and try to break the chain.