SolutionSame engine, configured

Third-party risk that knows
where each vendor can hurt you.

A vendor is not a row in a list. It is a node connected to the services it provides, the data it touches, the controls you rely on it for, and the entities that depend on it. Tier it by the risk it actually carries, assess it on a schedule, and see the blast radius before an incident, not after.

Third-party risk (TPRM)

Vendor risk is a graph problem wearing a spreadsheet's clothes.

Onboard a third party and it enters the same fabric as everything else: linked to the services it supplies, the data classes it handles, the entities that rely on it, and the controls you depend on it to uphold.

Tiering follows from those links, not a manual guess. A vendor touching regulated data for three entities is not the same risk as one printing brochures, and the graph knows the difference. Assessments run on a schedule appropriate to the tier.

And when something changes, a failed assessment, an expired certification, a service outage, you can see everything downstream of that vendor immediately, because the edges to your entities and controls were there before you needed them.

On the record
Vendora node, linked to services and data
Tierderived from real exposure
Assesson a schedule fit to the tier
Dependswhich entities rely on it
Blast radiusdownstream impact, before an incident
A vendor list that cannot see downstream
is an address book, not a risk register.
Design partner programme

Bring us the question your regulator is going to ask.

A small cohort of regulated banks, NBFCs and the firms that own them. Early access, real influence, pricing that holds.

We are pre-launch and we will not dress it up. There are no logos on this page because there are none to show. Come and try to break the chain.