One tool · every industry · every framework · every user
When your board asks if the AI can be switched off, show them. Don't tell them.
New model-risk rules mean your regulator now expects you to prove your AI can be stopped, and that nothing it touched was left behind. Amzaa answers that on a screen: one action stops every agent, a deterministic floor keeps your compliance running with the AI off, and a sealed trail proves it, a trail your regulator can verify without trusting us.
The floor still runs. Deterministic checks, no model, no prompt. It has no switch, because a floor with a switch is not a floor.
1 switch
One kill-switch, one audit point. Stop every agent in one action, and every action it ever took is sealed in one place.
Sealed
A hash-chained, Merkle-sealed trail. Its root is published outside the database, to you. Tamper with any row and verification fails.
Why people come to us
Two reasons. One is on your desk today. One is coming for everyone.
On your desk now
"My regulator is asking about AI, and I cannot prove we control it."
A model-risk framework lands and the board turns to you. Can the AI be switched off? Can you show nothing leaked? Can an examiner check it themselves? Right now the honest answer is a slide deck and a promise. Amzaa makes it a live demonstration, and a sealed record they can verify.
Coming for everyone
"We are putting AI agents across the business, and nothing governs them."
Within a year every function will run agents that read, decide and act. The question stops being whether you have AI and becomes whether you can govern it: stop it, prove it, show who approved what. Amzaa is the rail those agents run on, built before you needed it.
Every feature is here because it answers a question someone will ask you.
The board · the regulator
"Turn off the AI. Now prove nothing it did is still running."
One kill-switch
One action stops every agent at once, and fails closed if it cannot confirm. Count the AI's actions before and after. The answer is a number on a screen, not an assurance.
The board said no to AI
"We are not allowed to run the model. Does the platform still work?"
The deterministic floor
Your compliance checks run with no model at all: coverage gaps, broken lineage, stale evidence, found the same way every time. It ran last night with the AI switched off, and has no off switch of its own.
The auditor · the examiner
"Who changed this record, and how do I know your log wasn't edited?"
A sealed, verifiable trail
Every write records who, when, what and why, sealed in a hash chain whose root you hold outside our database. Tamper with any row and verification fails. They check it themselves.
Five auditors, five frameworks
"We test the same controls again and again for PCI, ISO, SOC 2, RBI..."
Test once, comply many
One control framework maps to every standard that asks for it. Test a control once; PCI, HIPAA, ISO, SOC 2, RBI all update at once, with a live auto-rated score. Collect once, comply many.
Procurement · legal
"Is it accessible? Section 508? Or is that another project?"
Accessibility in the foundation
WCAG 2.2 AA is forced on for every tenant and cannot be disabled; Section 508 is forced on for federal. The box is ticked before procurement asks the question.
The CFO · the group
"Why nine systems and five consultants, across all our entities?"
One engine, many entities
Every solution and every entity on one engine and one graph, each isolated, rolled up into one view. A new solution is a configuration, not a project. Millions a year becomes a fraction of it.
The demo we open with
Tamper with a sealed record. Watch the chain break.
This is the moment that ends the meeting. Every write is hash-chained to the one before it. Change a value in a sealed row, and re-verifying no longer matches, from that row all the way down. Shown here as an illustration of the behaviour.
chain verified · 5 of 5 rows intact · root matches your published copy
In the product the trail is a Merkle-sealed, write-once table, and its root is signed and published to you. See how the proof works →
A floor that can be switched off is not a floor.
The deterministic floor
The AI was off all night. It still caught everything.
The floor checks coverage, orphaned citations, broken lineage and stale evidence with no model, no prompt and no inference. The same inputs give the same findings every run. There is nothing to hallucinate and nothing to explain to a regulator.
It runs on a schedule by itself, it ran last night with the AI switched off, and it has no off switch. That is the sentence most platforms cannot say.
Governance, risk, compliance, AI control and accessibility. One engine.
The things enterprises buy separately, and stitch together badly, are one platform here. Governed on the same graph, sealed in the same trail, killable on the same switch.
Govern
Policy, the control framework, board, committees, reg-change.
Comply
Controls per entity, test once, comply many, auto-rated.
Manage risk
Inherent, residual, third-party, on every record.
Audit & assure
Engagements, tests, findings, a sealed forensic trail.
Govern AI
Propose-approve-write rail, one kill-switch, one audit point.
Submit
Filing deadlines fetched from the source, human-verified.
Stay accessible
WCAG enforced for everyone, 508 for federal, in the foundation.
Configure your own
A new solution is a configuration, live on save. Zero code.
And at any size, any structure
SMEMid-marketEnterpriseListed & regulatedHolding & operatingPE firm & portfolioGovernment & federal
Why a competitor cannot just add this
These are not features bolted onto a governance tool. They are the foundation it stands on.
AI-off proof
Deterministic to the core
The floor never used a model, so switching the AI off does not degrade it. A platform built model-first cannot remove the model and keep working. That is a rebuild, not a setting.
Sealed by design
The chain is how writes happen
Tamper-evidence is not a log you switch on. Every write is derived and sealed by the database itself. There is no path to change a record that skips it.
Patented
The strongest claims, filed early
Time-travel, legal hold, a Merkle chain that breaks on a touch, test-once-comply-many, and a kill-switch cluster filed before the RBI's 2026 draft framework.
Design partner programme
Bring us the question your regulator is going to ask.
A small cohort across banking, fintech, insurance, healthcare, technology, private equity and the public sector. Early access, real influence, pricing that holds.
We are pre-launch and we will not dress it up. There are no logos on this page because there are none to show. Come and try to break the chain.
Thanks — it's with us.
We read every one of these ourselves. Here's what you sent: